A Bridge Too Far

General Horrocks (Edward Fox) begins what may be my favorite pre-mission briefing, thus: "This is a story you will tell your grandchildren, and mightily bored they'll be." The story is of a vast and multi-layered nature, it's the tale of Market-Garden, the largest airborne operation mounted. It is the operation designed to take and hold the bridges running from Holland into Germany across the Rhine River. It was big and ambitious and severely costly.

In true seventies fashion, in a story told by a British director (Academy Award Winner Richard Attenborough,) the story unfolds slowly and stiffly, but has its moments. The landscape is salted appropriately with humor and bad accents, but it remains something likened to one of today's four-hour epic tales, the kind you need to purchase the special edition to experience. Unfortunately humorous in tone, however littered with some of the best actors of the time including Sean Connery, Edward Fox, Michael Caine, James Caan, Elliot Gould, Robert Redford, Gene Hackman, Anthony Hopkins and Laurence Olivier. Have I ever mentioned how much I love a great ensemble cast? Well, let me say again, then: I LOVE A GREAT ENSEMBLE CAST and this one is one of the best.

After having the rug pulled from beneath my feet by HBO's Band of Brothers, this one is a bit watery, but considering the time and the fact that the social climate was still recovering from Vietnam, this one is still very well written, charging forward until brutally stopped in Arnham, Holland, the tragedy slowly taking its toll on the men in front of the lens. And the layers, each individual plot line, grant the viewer a sort of episode by episode series of events which allow us to choose our favorites and be fans. I am fond of Robert Redford's charge across a part of the river, the line involving James Caan's character and the bit with Elliot Gould's 101st Airborne's rebuilding of the Son Bridge. They highlight beautifully what an ensemble piece is supposed to be, a blending.

My problem is that there is too much set dressing and not enough substance; during this viewing, either because of my fatigue after the events of this week at work or simply because of the length of this film, I fell asleep in the middle of the slump between hours one and two. And its not because a three hour film is incapable of keeping my attention (because it did for four consecutive Christmas Eve afternoons with films by Peter Jackson at the beginning of this decade,) I simply am able to better devote my attention during an epic-sized film when the pacing is quicker. A friend of mine is fond of perusing Jackson's epic trilogy by leaving out half of the plot, the one involving two hobbits and a parasite named Gollum. This film-watching tactic may be applicable here, as well. But in order to get the scope, I'm afraid I watch all of it all the time.

The opening narration breaks down the hope of the operation as "so many plans in so many wars." And, like some of the best laid plans, this one fails to the cost of thousands of lives. The desperation is keenly felt in each place, but none as severe as the razing of Arnham. Mr. Attenborough presents a very realistic level of cost of life, not glorifying nor criticizing war and war efforts, but simply presenting the facts, almost to the level of a documentarian. The film is cut and dry and simply honest; a bit long, but true to its nature. A fine example of a well-constructed film presentation.

****

In: Gene Hackman

Out: Edward Fox

Coming Soon: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory